RESOLUTION Nº 18/78
November 18, 1978
1. The kidnapping
in Buenos Aires of former Senator HIPOLITO SOLARI IRIGOYEN was denounced
in a communication and cables dated August 24, 1976.
2. On August 26,
1976, via cable, the Commission transmitted the pertinent parts of this
denunciation to the Government of Argentina, requesting that the
pertinent information be supplied.
3. The Government
of Argentina replied by cable on August 31, 1976, to the Commission's
request and provided the following information:
a result of investigations, the relevant authorities on the 30th
of this month obtained the release of former Senator Solari Irigoyen and
former Congressman Amaya, who had been kidnapped by an as yet
4. In a
communication dated September 2, 1976, the Commission transmitted to the
claimants the pertinent parts of the information supplied by the
Government of Argentina, and invited their observations.
5. The claimant,
in a note dated September 14, 1976, reported that although former
Senator Solari had appeared alive, he was detained and placed at the
disposal of the Executive (PEN) by virtue of the enforcement of the
state of siege, and that he was being held in the facilities of the
Fifth Army Corps, in the city of Bahía Blanca, in the southern part of
Buenos Aires province.
6. The Commission,
meeting in its 39th Session, decided to request additional information
from the Argentine Government regarding the arrest of Senator Solari
Irigoyen, particularly whether any charges had been brought against him.
The above-mentioned information was requested in a note dated December
7. In a
communication dated January 11, 1977, the Government of Argentina
replied to the request of the Commission in the following terms:
regard to this matter, be advised that Dr. Hipólito Solari Irigoyen is
detained at the disposal of the Executive by Decree 1831/76 because of
his links with subversive activities; and is in excellent state of
I wish to inform the Hon. President that he will be duly advised when
Dr. Solari Irigoyen is called to appear before the courts of this
8. In a letter
dated January 14, 1977, the pertinent parts of the reply from the
Argentine Government were transmitted to the claimants, and they were
invited to make further observations.
9. The claimant,
in a letter of January 14, 1977, presented the following comments:
communication of the Argentine Government indicates that "Dr.
Solari Irigoyen is detained at the disposal of the Executive by Decree
1831/76 because of his links with subversive activities." We wish
to remind you that Dr. Solari Irigoyen and his colleague, Dr. Mario Abel
Amaya, who died in prison, were victims of an uninvestigated kidnapping,
for which the parties responsible have gone unpunished. They were later
detained at the disposal of the Executive, which is evidence that there
have been no charges or trial, by virtue of the state of siege.
to the affirmation that Dr. Solari Irigoyen has "links with
subversive activities," this must be proven in a trial, which has
not as yet taken place although the communication assures that "you
will be duly advised when Dr. Solari Irigoyen is called to appear before
the courts of this nation.'' In this regard, it should be noted that
according to Argentine law, a citizen may remain incomunicado for
five days (5), and after this time he must be brought to trial or set
he is called to appear, Dr. Solari Irigoyen can exercise his legitimate
right of defense, and at the same time this will enable consideration to
be given to all the details regarding the kidnapping of which he was a
victim. But, the fact remains that Dr. Solari Irigoyen is serving a
virtual sine die sentence, without having been brought to trial
and without having been called to appear in court nor has there been any
accusation made against him to this date.
communication of the Argentine Government also states that Dr. Solari
Irigoyen is in an "excellent state of health." Obviously the
information of the authorities fails to include information from those
persons who subject the former legislator to corporal and mental
punishment. Moreover, the general conditions which exist in Rawson
prison are a virtual aggravation of the sentence--in the case of Dr.
Solari Irigoyen and the other prisoners at the disposal of PEN, an
illegal sentence--since the physical and mental wellbeing of the
political prisoners are being harmed in violation of the
In a communication dated February 10, 1977, the claimant sent to
the Commission a copy of the affidavit of the Federal Lower Court,
containing the following:
HEREBY CERTIFY: Under the Law, that Dr. Hipólito SOLARI IRIGOYEN has
not been brought to trial in any proceedings of this Court, that this
Court has not sought nor is interested in his detention, and that there
is no impediment in the court to his leaving the country. Furthermore,
it is stated that the above-named professional man was questioned under
the terms of article two hundred thirty-six, second paragraph, of the
Criminal Code, in case N 378, folio 183, year 1976, entitled 'Annotated
Summary to determine alleged violation of Law N 20.840, that he was at
no time charged in the above-mentioned case, in which a temporary stay
was issued on the second day of December 1976, (Art. 435 par. 1 of the
Criminal Code), with a statement that no person had been brought to
In notes dated May 9 and 19, 1977, the Government of Argentina
advised the following:
am pleased to write to you with regard to case 2088 and, on instructions
from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Argentina, to advise you that by
Executive Decree N 1098 authorization has been granted for the person
detained at the disposal of the Executive, Hipólito Solari Irigoyen, to
leave the country.
Hipólito Solari Irigoyen left for Venezuela on May 17 of this year, on
VIASA Flight 941."
The Commission received from the claimants a letter dated October
16, 1977, containing the following declaration of Mr. Hipólito Solari
have noted the reply of the military Government of Argentina dated
September 1, 1976, and the report dated January 11, 1977, regarding the
arbitrary detention to which I was subjected.
feel obliged to indicate that the affirmations contained in those
reports are false:
I was never 'kidnapped by unidentified groups.' I was arrested on
August 17, 1976 in a military operation ordered by the Chief of Security
and the Second Chief of the V Army Corps, with headquarters in Bahía
Blanca; the order was carried out in Area 536, with headquarters in
Trelew. I was arrested at my home address, Puerto Madryn, Province of
Chubut, by uniformed military who later plundered my home and blew up my
It is not true that I was 'set free' by police authorities on
August 30, 1976. I was transferred from Communications Regiment 181 in
Bahía Blanca, where I had been kept, to the city of Vidma, where I was
thrown on to the side of the road, and immediately picked up by a police
car. My illegal arrest thus became a legal arrest. Both before and after
the alleged 'liberation' I was subject to cruel torments.
I have never had links with subversive activities of any kind. I
have always condemned any kind of violence. I was never charged before a
Court, nor have I been brought to trial. I was detained for nine months
at the disposal of the Executive until I was expelled from the country
and forbidden to return.
Congressman Mario Abel Amaya was also arrested on August 17, 1976
at his home address in Trelew, Province of Chubut and went through the
same events as I until September 11, 1976 when we were both transferred
in a navy airplane from Bahía Blanca to the Naval Air Base ‘Almirante
Zar' in Trelew, and from there to Rawson prison. As a consequence of the
brutal punishment we received in the Base and in the prison, and the
lack of medical attention during the early days, Congressman Amaya who
was in critical condition, was transferred to the hospital of Villa
Devoto Prison in Buenos Aires, where he died on October 19, 1976."
In letter dated August 1, 1978, the claimants provided the
following additional information:
also wish to point out the violation of human rights being committed in
cases in which the individual is prohibited from returning to his
country. In fact, according to the so-called Law 21.228 decreed by the
Military Government on June 25, 1976, the penal code included--in art.
28l(ter.)--sentences of up to four years in prison for those persons who
leave the country, and there is a decree placing them at the disposal of
the Executive, as in this case, should they ever return.
further flagrant violation of human rights is the treatment received by
Congressman Amaya and by Dr. Solari during the time they were in prison.
As a consequence of the beatings and tortures they were subjected to,
Congressman Arnaya died and Dr. Solari's health seriously
In a note dated August 4, 1978, the Commission transmitted to the
Government of Argentina the pertinent parts of the additional
information supplied by the claimants. As of this date, there has been
no reply from the Argentine Government.
1. In the light of
the preceding, it appears that Dr. Hipólito Solari Irigoyen was
detained and tortured by the Argentine authorities;
2. In a note dated
January 11, 1977, the Government of Argentina told the Commission that
it would duly advise it when Dr. Solari was to be called to appear
before the courts of the nation, but such information has not been
supplied by this date;
3. Dr. Solari
Irigoyen, due to a lack of guarantees for his personal safety, was
obliged to abandon Argentina and was authorized to do so by the
Government through Executive Decree N 1098 of 1977,
INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, RESOLVES:
1. To advise the
Government of Argentina that such acts constitute very serious
violations of the right to liberty and personal security (Art. I); to
the right to residence (Art. VIII); to the right to a fair trial (Art.
XVIII); and the right to protection against arbitrary arrest (Art. XXV)
of the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man.
2. To recommend to
the Government of Argentina: a. that it order a complete and impartial
investigation in order to determine responsibility for the reported
actions; b. that in accordance with Argentine law, the persons
responsible be duly punished, and c. that a report be made to the
Commission, within a maximum period of 30 days, regarding the measures
taken to implement the recommendations listed in the present Resolution.
3. To communicate
this Resolution to the Government of Argentina and to the claimants.
4. To include this Resolution in the Annual Report to the General Assembly of the Organization of American States pursuant to Art. 9 (bis), paragraph c. iii of the Statute of the Commission.