|
C.
Petitions and cases before the Inter-American Commission on
Human Rights
1.
Precautionary measures granted by the IACHR during 2002
9.
Precautionary measures are provided for in Article 25 of the Commission’s
Rules of Procedure, which states that in serious and urgent cases, and
whenever necessary, according to the information available, the
Commission may, on its own initiative or upon request by a party,
request that the State concerned adopt precautionary measures to
prevent irreparable harm to persons.If the Commission is not in session, the President, or, in his
or her absence, one of the Vice-presidents, shall consult with the
other members, through the Executive Secretariat, on possible
application of precautionary measures. If it is not possible to
consult within a reasonable period of time under the circumstances,
the President shall take the decision on behalf of the Commission and
shall so inform its members. The
Commission may request information from the interested parties on any
matter related to the adoption and observance of the precautionary
measures. The request for
such measures and their adoption shall not prejudice the final
decision.
10.
What follows is a
summary of the precautionary measures granted or extended by the IACHR
during 2002. It should be
noted that the number of precautionary measures does not correlate
with the number of individuals protected thereby since the IACHR’s
precautionary measures can protect either one person or an
unquantifiable group of persons, often covering communities or groups
of people.
a.
Argentina
11.
On April 10, 2002 the Commission granted precautionary
measures on behalf of María
Adelina Sarruggi (daughter), Concepción
Flecha González, and Arsiliare
Sarruggi (parents). The request indicates that since November 18,
2000 the child, María Adelina, who was three months old at the time,
has been separated from her biological parents, to the detriment of
all three persons. The petitioners alleged that mother and daughter
were traveling from Argentina to Paraguay, with their papers in order
and with the appropriate travel authorization from the father, when
immigration officers at a border post in the Province of Misiones
detained them "for not producing documentation establishing the
link between mother and daughter."The mother was detained and the daughter initially went into a
hospital and was then placed in the custody of a married couple on the
list of adoption candidates. They alleged that the authorities did not
notify the father, who holds parental rights; he found out about these
events in March 2001. According to
the information provided, when the father traveled to Misiones to get
his daughter and partner back, the family court judge told him that he
could go to the mayor’s office to get his partner and to begin legal
proceedings to get his daughter back. The petitioners indicated that
the family has very limited resources and their daughter had not yet
been returned to them. They
requested precautionary measures both to prevent the presiding judge
from issuing an adoption ruling in favor of the couple on the list of
adoption candidates and to have the girl immediately returned to her
biological parents. The
Commission asked the State to take the necessary steps to preserve the
mental and moral integrity of the girl and her biological parents;
their right to protection of the family, enshrined in Article 17 of
the American Convention; and, in the case of the girl, the right to a
name and the rights of the child, enshrined in Articles 18 and 19 of
the Convention. The
Commission requested, in particular, that the State take all necessary
steps to ensure that the girl was not taken out of Argentina and that
it investigate and provide a report, to clarify the situation and
protect the rights of these three persons. In response, the State
first reported on the measures taken to prevent the girl from being
removed from national territory and then on returning the girl to her
biological family.
12. On July 11, 2002 the Commission renewed
the precautionary measures that had been granted on August 27, 2001 on
behalf of María Dolores Gómez
and her family. The
Commission had granted precautionary measures and requested that the
State take steps to protect the life and person of Dr. María Dolores
Gómez, public defender in the Province of Buenos Aires, and her
family, based on the information received indicating that she had been
the victim of a series of threats and harassment. The petitioners
alleged that those events, including one attack, anonymous phone
calls, and serious threats, were related to the performance of her
functions, particularly in connection with protecting the rights of
prisoners. The Commission
also asked the State to report on the measures taken to determine the
origin of the threats and to try those responsible, and to end the
risk to Dr. Gómez, her family, and the witnesses who testified about
the threats against her. Following
initial exchanges of information that reported, inter
alia, on the protection of the beneficiaries by official security
forces, the parties continued to present information and observations
on the precautionary measures.
b.
Bolivia
13.
On October 3, 2002 the Commission granted precautionary
measures on behalf of 52
persons, including two minors, who are carriers of the human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV/AIDS).The beneficiaries are identified in the file; however, at their
request, their identities are being kept confidential in this report.The beneficiaries alleged that in many cases they had turned to
State public health systems but had not obtained assistance to undergo
the tests necessary to determine how the disease is progressing or to
receive the anti-retroviral treatment needed for them to survive.On January 22, 2003 the State presented a photocopy of the
report of the National Program on STDs/HIV/AIDS.
c.
Brazil
14.
On March 14, 2002 the Commission
granted precautionary measures on behalf of inmates in the Urso Branco prison, located in Porto Velho, state of
Rondonia. In the request for precautionary measures, the Commission
was informed that since January 2002 there had been several conflicts
between groups of inmates, as well as a massacre among the prisoners,
resulting in the deaths of over 30 inmates.The petition indicated that the 47 survivors were at risk of
being killed. In light of the State's failure to comply with the
precautionary measures, the Commission asked the Inter-American Court
of Human Rights to take provisional measures to protect the life and
person of inmates in the aforementioned prison.The Court issued those measures on June 18, 2002.
15.
On June 4, 2002 the Commission granted
precautionary measures on behalf of Iriny
Nicolau Corres Lopes. The
request alleged that Mrs. Lopes, a human rights defender in the state
of Espíritu Santo, was receiving death threats because of complaints
she made in relation to organized crime operating in that state.The precautionary measures requested by the IACHR were aimed at
protecting the life and person of Mrs. Lopes and investigating the
threats. On June 14, 2002
the State informed the IACHR that it was complying with the
precautionary measures, by providing four federal police officers to
protect Mrs. Lopes. On
December 20, 2002 at the request of the petitioners, the Commission
extended the precautionary measures for six months.
16.
On August 19, 2002, the Commission
granted precautionary measures on behalf of Rony Clay Chaves, Rubens Leoncio Pereira, Marcos Massari, and Gilmar
Leite Siquiera. The request for precautionary measures indicated
that prisoners were taken out of prison intermittently to be used as
collaborators in the intelligence activities of a special group of the
Military Police of São Paulo known as GARDI. Those activities
allegedly include the assassination of 12 persons in an ambush known
as Operación Castelinho,
planned in advance by the Military Police to present it to public
opinion as a successful robbery prevention operation by the Military
Police of São Paulo. The protected persons indicated their
willingness to testify about their activities and, as a result, had
allegedly been threatened both by military police officers and other
inmates. The precautionary measures requested by the IACHR were aimed
at protecting the life and person of those threatened.On August 26, 2002 the State presented information to the
Commission, which was subsequently disputed by the petitioners on
October 11, 2002. Both
parties have provided additional information, and the precautionary
measures remain in effect.
17.
On September 23, 2002 the Commission granted precautionary measures on
behalf of Manoel Bezerra, Rosmary Souto, and Luiz Da Silva.The request indicated that along the border between the states
of Paraíba and Pernambuco there was an “extermination group” that
existed with the acquiescence of the police and state authorities,
received financing from local merchants, and had allegedly killed over
100 persons (street children, alleged criminals, and homosexuals) in
the last seven years.It alleged that Councilman Manuel Matos and Justice Advocate
Rosmary Souto had received death threats for having denounced and
investigated those deaths. It
also indicated that Luiz Da Silva was a member of the extermination
group and later withdrew from the group and made public statements on
its activities; as a result, he was the victim of an attack in which
he was shot five times. The
precautionary measures requested by the IACHR were aimed at protecting
the life and person of those threatened and at investigating the
threats. The State did
not provide any information on compliance with the measures.On October 30, 2002 the petitioners informed the Commission
that some of the measures were being fulfilled.
18.
On October 29, 2002 the Commission
granted precautionary measures on behalf of Zenilda Maria de Araujo and Marcos Luidson de Araujo (Cacique
Marquinhos), indigenous leaders of the Xucuru people. The
petitioners indicated in their request that for over 13 years they had
been awaiting completion of the demarcation of their lands in the
state of Pernambuco and that, throughout the process, Xucuru
indigenous leaders had been killed or threatened each time
implementation of the demarcation process was announced.They added that the process of demarcating land and awarding
titles for indigenous lands was at a defining point, endangering the
life and person of those for whom protection was sought.The precautionary measures requested by the IACHR were aimed at
protecting the life and person of those threatened and investigating
the threats. The State
did not provide any information on the compliance with the measures by
the deadline and, on January 21, 2003, indicated that Marcos Luidson
de Araujo had refused the protection offered to him by the federal
government. The
Commission summoned both parties to a hearing to be held in February
2003 during its 117th regular session.
19.
On November 21, 2002 the Commission
granted precautionary measures on behalf of Elma Soraya Souza Novais. In
this regard, the Commission was told that one of Mrs. Novais’ sons
was killed in December 1999; at the insistence of Mrs. Novais and
because of her complaints, four military police officers from the
state of Pernambuco were tried. The
petitioners claimed that the military police officers allegedly
involved had threatened Mrs. Novais and assaulted her in different
ways; moreover, one witness to the crime was killed.The precautionary measures requested by the IACHR were aimed at
protecting the life and person of Mrs. Novais and investigating the
threats. The State did
not provide information on the compliance of the measures by the
deadline and, on January 22, 2003, it indicated that it had asked the
Federal Police to protect Mrs. Novais, in accordance with the terms
requested by the IACHR. The
Commission summoned both parties to a hearing to be held in February
2003 during its117th regular session.
d.
Canada
20.
On February 19, 2002 the Commission granted precautionary
measures to stay the deportation of Ikbal Iskander, a citizen of both
Sudan and Egypt, and her four year old daughter, Gina Aziez, a
Canadian citizen. Ms.
Iskander's deportation from Canada to Egypt was scheduled for Friday,
February 22, 2002.Ms. Iskander sought refuge in Canada and claimed that she
fled religious and gender persecution and also an abusive spouse in
Egypt. She claimed to
have no knowledge of the whereabouts of her husband and her
nonCanadian children. Her
husband is Islamic and she converted from Islam to Coptic Christianity
and claims that she would be considered an apostate if deported to
Egypt, a predominantly Islamic state.She fears that physical harm would come to her if deported.Her claim for refugee status was denied, as was her application
for leave and for judicial review.The Commission noted that Ms. Iskander still had domestic
remedies to exhaust and if she were deported those remedies would be
rendered moot.The
Commission requested that the deportation be stayed and that
information on the measures taken by the Government to stay the
deportation be presented to the Commission within ten days.At the expiration of ten days, no information was presented
with regard to the request for precautionary measures. On July 30,
2002 however, the Commission received information from the State
indicating that Ms. Iskander had not been deported. Further information was submitted informally to the effect that
on February 21, 2002 the Federal Court of Canada-Trial Division
granted the stay of execution of Ms. Iskander's deportation.No further information has been communicated from either
party.
e.
Colombia
21.
On January 2, 2002 the Commission granted precautionary
measures on behalf of afro-Colombian
communities in 49 hamlets in the Naya river basin in Buenaventura.The available information indicates that since the end of
November 2001 there have been approximately 300 paramilitary members
in northern Cauca and the southern part of Valle del Cauca, in the
municipalities of Timba, Suárez, and Buenos Aires, who have
threatened the Naya and Yurumanguí river indigenous, afro-Colombian,
and campesino communities. The
petitioners indicated that since December and January 2001, the United
Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC) had been present in the upper
Naya up to Carmen and Yurumanguí threatening the inhabitants to make
them leave the area. On December 27, 2001 the threats were repeated.In its request, the Commission asked the State, firstly, to
take steps to provide for unarmed civil protection and effective
perimeter control by law enforcement, to prevent armed incursions into
the Naya and Yurumanguí basins by the mouth of the Pacific, in
consultation with the Naya Community Council and the petitioners.
Secondly, the State was asked to take preventive measures, including
having a law enforcement presence at the mouths of the Yurumanguí
and El Naya as a control measure to prevent illegal actors from
entering the hamlets where the afro-Colombian communities reside; and
to provide for the immediate and ongoing presence of entities, such as
the Office of the Public Prosecutor of the Nation and the Office of
the Ombudsman, headquartered in Puerto Merizalde, in coordination with
the National Office of the Ombudsman in Bogotá, as dissuasive,
preventive mechanisms. Thirdly,
the State was asked to strengthen its early warning system by
implementing effective communication systems.Finally, it was asked to launch an investigation into the acts
of violence alleged in the request and to try and punish the
perpetrators. In its
reply, the State indicated that the Presidential Program for Human
Rights and the Ministry of the Interior met with governors and mayors
in the region and that law enforcement, the Third Brigade of the
National Army, and certain naval units were engaged in intelligence
and information-gathering efforts.The Office of the Ombudsman reported that it was implementing
ongoing observation in the region, in coordination with the early
warning system. The State also reported that the National Human Rights
Unit of the Attorney General’s Office was conducting an
investigation, which was in the probable cause phase.The Commission has continued to receive complaints from
the petitioners about threats and acts of intimidation and violence
against the protected communities.
22.
On January 11, 2002 the IACHR granted precautionary
measures on behalf of 110
members of the La Balsita Living and Working Community in
Dabeiba, department of El Chocó. The request indicated that on
December 31, 2001 a paramilitary group of approximately 100 men
made an incursion into the Caracolón-La España farm–a community
property given by the State to the aforementioned displaced community.The information indicated, inter
alia, that “...many of the armed men were dressed in camouflage,
some with military badges, with special forces emblems. Since then,
the population has been intimidated and their provisional houses
searched; and the armed men have used community goods and conducted
lengthy interrogations of the campesinos and the Catholic monks and
nuns who are with them on a permanent basis. [...] The Office of the
Vice President […] and the National Office of the Ombudsman have
been informed of all these situations; the response the petitioners
have received is that the Fourth Brigade is already apprised of the
situation.” In response, the State confirmed the permanent presence
of law enforcement in the region and an increase in manpower from the
Sixth Army Brigade in the municipality. The municipal representative
of Dabeiba reported that three complaints of forced disappearance were
lodged and are in the preliminary investigation phase. The Social
Solidarity Network, in turn, reported on different investments in
productive projects, humanitarian assistance, and programs to return
the displaced population.
23.
On February 8, 2002 the IACHR granted precautionary
measures on behalf of Marco
Tulio Bustos Ortiz, Jairo Javier Bustos Acuña, and María Esneda
Bustos, witnesses in
the trial for the Mapiripán massacre that occurred from July 15 to 20, 1997 which gave rise to
the processing of Case 12.250 by the IACHR.The Bustos family, whose property was burned and who was
displaced as a result of the massacre, had to move over five times due
to harassment and threats made against them after they gave statements
on the formation of paramilitary groups in Casanare and the alleged
involvement of current and former members of the Army. On November 23,
2002 the petitioners informed the IACHR that the beneficiaries had
settled in Canada.
24.
On February 22, 2002 the IACHR granted precautionary
measures on behalf of María
Luisa Murillo López, a
correspondent for the newspaper El
Tiempo; Efraín Jiménez, a correspondent for RCN Radio; and Alfonso
Altamar, Manuel Taborda, and Francis Paul Altamar, correspondents
for CMI Televisión and Noticias Uno in San Vicente del Caguán, who had received death
threats from the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) because
of their work in journalism.In its reply, the State reported that an evaluation and risk
assessment of the beneficiaries was being conducted and humanitarian
assistance provided.
25.
On March 15, 2002 the IACHR granted precautionary measures
on behalf of 40 Embera Chamí indigenous
persons in the reservations and settlements of
Cañamomo-Lomaprieta, San Lorenzo, Nuestra Señora Candelaria de la
Montaña, Escopetera-Pirza, Totumal, La Trina, La Albania, Cerro
Tacón, and La Soledad and members of the Regional Indigenous
Council of Caldas (CRIDEC).Since June 2001, these communities–which State agents
have publicly named as collaborators of the guerillas–had been the
victims of threats, harassment, and violence by the AUC.Available information indicated that an armed group made an
incursion into the community of Escopetera-Pirza causing material
damage, intimidating those present, killing Leonardo Díaz Becerra
(former town councilor for the reservation) and wounding Luis Eduardo
Flórez (alternate treasurer of the indigenous town council).The petitioners indicated that despite efforts by a number of
nongovernmental organizations, the authorities had not taken any steps
to prevent paramilitary incursions in the area and did not provide
support for going into the area for humanitarian purposes.The IACHR was subsequently informed of the assassination of
indigenous leader María Fabiola Largo and an assassination attempt
against former indigenous governor Miguel Antonio Largo Pescador, both
of whom were beneficiaries of the precautionary measures granted on
April 9, 2002 for the Cañamomo-Lomaprieta reservation.The State also reported on a mission conducted by the
Administrative Security Department (DAS) to shed light on the attacks,
but indicated that the testimony compiled “… did not provide
information of interest to individually identify the perpetrators or
provide evidence to the investigating authority.”It also said that the Ayacucho Batallion had conducted
counter-insurgency raids in Riosucio and that the municipal police
were providing security at Community meeting sites. The Commission has
continued to receive information on the situation of the indigenous
community and the threat of incursions.
26.
On March 15, 2002 the IACHR granted precautionary measures
on behalf of Rafael Gómez Serrano, Jahel Quiroga Carrillo, Diana
Gallego, Luis Alberto Matta, Diana García, Edilma Rosa Granados,
Denys Jiménez, Astrid Suárez, Alejandra Vega, and Celmira Moreno,
members of the human rights organization REINICIAR,
headquartered in Bogotá. According to the request, the beneficiaries
had systematically been the victims of verbal and written threats and
acts of intimidation, such as being followed and attacks in which they
were named as collaborators of dissident armed groups.The Commission decided to grant precautionary measures at its
114th regular session and asked the State, inter
alia, to effectively investigate the origin of the threats and
harassment and to present information on whether or not the
organization’s telephone lines had been tapped illegally.
27.
On April 12, 2002 the Commission granted precautionary
measures on behalf of
Lieutenant Colonel Orozco Castro, a commander assigned to the
Seventh Brigade under General Uscátegui during the July 1997 massacre
of 49 civilians in Mapiripán, Meta. Lieutenant Colonel Orozco Castro
warned his superiors of the imminence of the paramilitary incursion in
which the victims were massacred, and his testimony linked senior Army
commanders to the investigation.The international responsibility of the State in the
aforementioned incidents is being examined in Case 12.250, pending
before the IACHR. Because of his statements, the beneficiary had been
constantly harassed, and current and former members of the Army have
publicly voiced their hostility towards him and acknowledged that he
was being followed. The
IACHR has continued to receive information about threats made by the
AUC against the beneficiary. In response to the precautionary
measures, the State took steps to protect the beneficiary and his
family.
28.
On April 19, 2002 the Commission granted precautionary
measures on behalf of Luz Perly
Córdoba Mosquera, Santos Mendoza, Rodrigo Alberto Pacheco, Hugo
Alberto Peña, Luis Alfonso Gutiérrez B., Pedro Luis Sosa, Apolinar
Herrera, Antonio Yotagri, María Teresa Rincón, and Hermes Villada, members
of the Asociación Campesina de
Arauca (ACA).The petitioners alleged that after ACA members took part in a
campesino demonstration, Mrs. Luz Perly Córdoba was harassed
and Henry Neira, director of the ACA Municipal Committee in Saravena,
was killed. On March 13,
2002 Hugo Alberto Peña Camargo, ACA's acting-president was detained
by members of the Batallion Héroes
de Saraguro battalion, intended to intimidate him.The State reported that the prosecution office assigned to work
with the Criminal Law Judges of the Special Circuit in Arauca had
delegated in the DAS the criminal investigation into the alleged
threats against ACA members. After
precautionary measures were adopted, the petitioners informed the
IACHR that the harassment and threats against the beneficiaries had
not stopped.
29.
On April 25, 2002 the Commission granted precautionary
measures on behalf of Amelia
Pérez Parra, Leonardo Augusto Cabana Fonseca, Lucía Margarita Luna
Prada, Amparo Cerón Ojeda, Luis Augusto Sepúlveda Reyes, and Giovani
Alvarez Santoyo, members of the National Human Rights Unit, and
Martha Cecilia Camacho, an investigator with the Technical
Investigative Body (CTI), who were threatened by paramilitary leaders
Carlos Castaño and Salvatore Mancuso because of their involvement in
a series of investigations being conducted by the National Human
Rights Unit of the Government Attorney’s Office, involving
high-level members of the armed forces.One of the prosecutors, Luis Augusto Sepúlveda Reyes, was
dismissed from his post on April 23, 2002 before he could issue an
arrest warrant. The Commission asked the State to take the necessary steps
to protect the life of the beneficiaries and investigate the threats
against them.
30.
On May 15, 2002 the Commission granted precautionary
measures on behalf of Javier
Carrascal Martínez, Plinio Rafael Barros Quiñones, Danuil Duran
Tellez, Miled Humberto Guerrero, and Juan de Jesus Madarriaga
in the municipal capital of El Tarra, department of Norte de
Santander. According to
the request received by the Commission, on April 15, 2002
paramilitary groups established checkpoints along the roads leading to
the municipality of El Tarra and caused several persons to disappear,
after which they announced a “cleansing” campaign in indigenous
communities (corregimientos)
in the area. It also claims that on April 16, after a clash with the
police, paramilitary members took control of the municipal capital and
exiled Plinio Rafael Barros Quiniones, Danuil Duran Tellez, Miled
Humberto Guerrero, and Juan de Jesus Madarriaga under the threat of
extrajudicial execution and death.They also ordered the mayor of El Tarra, Javier Carrascal, to
cooperate or else be considered a military target.The petitioners indicated that this situation had led to the
displacement of many of the municipality's inhabitants and that there
were at least three executions from May 2 to 6, 2002.In its reply, the State indicated that offensive operations
were being conducted to banish illegal armed groups and that
disciplinary proceedings were being implemented.The petitioners indicated, however, that no steps had been
taken to protect the life and person of the beneficiaries and that
security conditions in El Tarra continued to deteriorate because
paramilitary groups were acting with impunity.
31.
On June 10, 2002 the IACHR granted precautionary measures
on behalf of Jesús González
Luna, a member of the executive committee of the United Workers
Federation (CUT), director of human rights of the CUT, and member of
the CRER (Risk Assessment Committee responsible for implementing IACHR
precautionary measures in Colombia) who had been continuously
receiving threats since 1995 in a context of widespread violence
against members of the Colombian union movement, including attacks in
which his guards were killed.On May 1, 2002 while he was trying to clarify an incident in
which two known members of the AUC were photographing and filming
participants in the Labor Day march in Cali, Jesús González Luna and
his guard were surrounded by a dozen police officers dressed in black
and were truncheoned and kicked. The State told the IACHR that the
investigation into the events of May 1, 2002 was in the hands of the
National Police Division, Cali district, at the instructions of the
Presidential Program on Human Rights and International Humanitarian
Law. Regarding the
protection plan designed for the beneficiary, the CRER recommended
granting special humanitarian aid, facilitating monthly air tickets,
and reinforcing the Cali residence of Jesús González Luna.
32.
On June 21, 2002, the IACHR granted precautionary measures
on behalf of Gustavo Petro
Urrego, a parliamentarian with a well-known track record in the
area of human rights. According
to the request received by the IACHR, there had been evidence of plans
to take the beneficiary’s life since February 2002 and Carlos
Castaño told a government official over the telephone that the
beneficiary “…would no longer be a problem" after July 20,
2002 the date on which the parliamentarian was to resume his functions
in Congress. During its
116th regular session, the IACHR granted a hearing at the
request of the Office of the Attorney General of the Nation, to follow
up on the validity of these precautionary measures.
33.
On July 15, 2002 the IACHR granted precautionary measures
on behalf of Pablo Bustos
Sánchez, director of the so-called Citizen’s Watch Committee,
which reports corruption in the administration of public resources to
judicial and control agencies. This
activity has made members of the Watch Committee the subject of
constant threats and persecution throughout the country, and six of
them had been killed in the last three years.The petitioners alleged that they learned, through reliable
sources, that there was a plan in place to kill Pablo Bustos Sánchez.Three days after precautionary measures were ordered, the
beneficiary received an anonymous letter at home threatening him and
his family with death, and his wife was assaulted on the highway.The beneficiary asked the State to strengthen its protection
plan, which is headed up by the DAS.
34.
On July 15, 2002 the Commission granted precautionary
measures on behalf of Luis
Felipe Santiago León, an activist in the Unión
Patriótica political movement who was the police inspector for
the municipio of Iconozo (Tolima) through June 1, 2002. The
petitioners indicated that in the early morning of April 17, 2002 Mr.
Santiago León was attacked at his residence with an incendiary bomb,
grenade, and gunfire. They indicated that they found pamphlets with
the inscription “Grupo Justiciero 14 de julio de 1997” [July 14, 1997 Avengers]
announcing new attacks and informing him that the Tolima Bloc of the
AUC had declared him a military target. As a result, the beneficiary
was forced to resign from his post as police inspector and leave the
municipality. The petitioners allege that, despite his displacement,
Mr. Luis Felipe Santiago León’s life continues to be in danger. He
has moved several times, since he is constantly being followed.
Although the Office of the Attorney General of the Nation investigated
the situation preliminarily, no case was opened. The State reported
that the Attorney General’s Office suggested that the investigation
be transferred to the Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law
Unit.
35.
On July 19, 2002 the IACHR granted precautionary measures
on behalf of 46 workers (physicians and
auxiliary and administrative personnel) at the Hospital del Municipio de
Puerto Lleras, department of Meta.According to the information received by the Commission, on
June 26, 2002, Front 43 of the FARC-EP convened a
meeting of health workers at the Hospital and ordered them to resign
from the posts and leave the location.The petitioners alleged that some workers at the Hospital
de Puerto Lleras had received direct threats.Mr. Leonidas Buitrago was detained by the Army and accused of
assisting the insurgency. Mrs.
Milagros Ipia Miranda and Mrs. Betzabeth López were threatened by
paramilitary members and accused of helping the insurgency.On July 3, 2002, James Bonilla Jiménez, a worker at the Centro
de Salud de Caño Rayado, which is part of the Hospital de Puerto Lleras, was threatened by paramilitary members
for helping the insurgency. In its reply, the State reported that it
entrusted the Commission of prosecutors assigned to work with the
Criminal Judges of the Special Circuit Court in the city of
Villavicencio with launching criminal investigations into the alleged
threats made to the beneficiaries. Regarding protective measures, the
State indicated that it had alerted the Seventh Army Brigade and that
the beneficiaries have been working as usual since July 6, 2002.
36.
On July 19, 2002 the Commission granted precautionary
measures on behalf of members
of the National Solidarity Aid Association (ANDAS) and social leaders
in Santander. On June
23, 2002 the Fidel Castaño Gil Urban Front, Bolívar Central Bloc of
the AUC released a public document ordering ten social leaders in
Bucaramanga, Santander and surrounding areas to leave the region or
lose their lives. Specifically, the threats were made to Hernando
Maldonado, a university professor who has handled projects on
displaced persons; Wilson Vega Castro, president of the Association of
Displaced Persons of Bucaramanga; Julio Avella García, founder of
ANDAS; Mercedes Usuga, age 75, leader of the UP in the Urabá region;
Luis Antonio Núñez, treasurer of the Association of Displaced
Persons of the Municipality de Girón, who had already been assaulted;
Alvaro Tapias, president of the Santander section of ANDAS; Belcy
Rincón, founder of the Santander section of ANDAS and wife of a UP
leader killed in 1998; María Gutriérrez, ANDAS spokeswoman in
Santander; and Nicanor Arciniegas, president of the Association of
Displaced Persons of Piedecuesta. In response, the State informed the
IACHR that risk assessments were being performed for the beneficiaries
and indicated that the investigation into the threats was being
conducted by the Third Prosecutor with the Special Criminal Courts;
however, the IACHR did not receive information on progress made in
that connection.
37.
On July 25, 2002 the IACHR granted precautionary measures
on behalf of journalists Alveiro
Echavarría, Alvaro Miguel Mima, Luis Eduardo Reyez (or Reyes), Hugo
Mario Palomari (or Palomar), Humberto Briñez, Wilson Barco, and Mario
Fernando Prado. The information received by the Special Rapporteur
for Freedom of Expression indicated that on July 19, 2002 the RCN news
program in Cali, department of Valle de Cauca, received a pamphlet
from the Manuel Cepeda Vargas Front of the Revolutionary Armed Forces
of Colombia (FARC) which read: “…in light of the tendentious
information from several media outlets and persons who call themselves
journalists, but who are nothing more than puppets of President
Pastrana’s military regime, our organization has decided to call on
the following journalists to leave the city of Cali within 72 hours or
else become military targets of our organization...” The information
provided by the petitioners indicated that the Ministry of the
Interior’s Program to Protect Journalists and Social Communicators
had taken safety measures to protect the aforementioned journalists
for a period of only five days. The State reported on the performance
of police patrols and continuous accompaniment by a guard and
indicated that the investigation into the threats had been assigned to
a prosecutor with the Unit for Crimes against Individual Liberty and
Other Guarantees.
38.
On July 29, 2002 the Commission granted precautionary
measures on behalf of 14 social
leaders from the department of Arauca.A violent paramilitary offensive was launched in September 2001
in the municipalities of Tame, Puerto Rondón, and Cravo Norte.This situation led to a public statement by the United Nations,
mobilization of social sectors in Arauca, and finally a commitment
signed on March 4, 2002 with the national government, which pledged to
ensure law enforcement presence.The petitioners alleged that the persons named as beneficiaries
in the request played a key role in the mobilization and the signature
of this agreement and that some of them were on a list of “military
targets” found by the Attorney General’s Office in the possession
of paramilitary leader Jesús Emiro Pereira, who was captured in
December 2001. The
petitioners feel that because of their high profile as spokespeople
for their communities, these social leaders are at serious risk of
being attacked by the AUC. They
had learned that a group of assassins had been hired by the AUC to
kill the social, political, and union leaders and communicators on the
list. On November 8,
2002, human rights defender José Rusbell Lara was killed; he was a
member of the Joel Sierra Regional Human Rights Committee and was a
beneficiary of the precautionary measures.In a press release, the IACHR condemned the killing, which
occurred in the municipal capital of Tame, and urged the State to
exhaustively investigate this crime, prosecute and punish the
perpetrators, and ensure that the rest of the human rights defenders
covered by the Commission’s request receive due protection (See
press release 45/02).
39.
40.
On August 6, 2002 the IACHR granted precautionary measures
on behalf of members of the
Colombian Legal Foundation (CORPOJURÍDICO), headquartered in
Apartadó, Antioquia, and the relatives of the victim in petition
P0597/2001 on the disappearance of Alcides Torres Arias. The
petitioner requested a hearing to present the testimony of the victim’s
mother during the 114th regular session of the IACHR in
Washington, D.C.; however, before departing, attorney María del
Carmen Flores Jaime, a member of CORPOJURÍDICO, was killed after she
met with the victim’s mother. The petitioners claim that, since
then, they have received threats and members of the organization have
had to move or go into exile abroad for security reasons.
41.
On August 27, 2002 the IACHR granted precautionary measures
on behalf of Diego Osorio,
Carlos Valencia, Aide Trujillo, Rodrígo López, Vicente Villarda,
Gerardo Santibáñez, Guillermo Cardona, Domingo Taboparda, Adriana,
Gonélez, María Teresa Henao, and others.On August 21, 2002 the Risaralda Teacher’s Union (SER)
received a leaflet by fax signed by the self-appointed Cacique
Calarcá Bloc of the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC)
ordering them to “leave the region within 15 days. If not, our units
will take the actions set forth by our general command.”The letter specifically named the following members of the
United Workers Union (CUT) and the Human Rights Committee (CDH): Diego
Osorio, district president of the CUT; Carlos Valencia, treasurer of
the executive committee of the CUT branch; Aide Trujillo, president of
the Risaralda Teacher’s Union (SER); Rodrigo López, vice president
of the SER; Vicente Villada, treasurer of the executive committee of
the SER branch; Gerardo Santibáñez, secretary general of the Public
Company Workers Union (SINTRAEMDES); Guillermo Cardona, President of
the Risaralda branch of the Permanent Committee for the Defense of
Human Rights (CPDH); Domingo Taborda, vice president of the Risaralda
branch of the CPDH; Adriana González, secretary general of the
Risaralda branch of the CPDH and member of the national executive
committee of the "Eduardo Umaña Mendoza" Association of
Defense Lawyers; María Teresa Henao, Risaralda branch of the CPDH;
Gustavo Marín, Risaralda branch of the CPDH; Dover Hoyos, Risaralda
branch of the CPDH; and Hernando Aguirre, Risaralda branch of the
CPDH.With regard to the protective measures taken by the State,
the IACHR received information on the reinforcement of the
headquarters of the CUT, SINTRAEMSDES, and the SER in October.Regarding implementation of protection plans, the State
reported that it was still awaiting the results of the risk
assessments, although it did approve the provision of national
airplane tickets for 13 of the beneficiaries. The State also indicated
that the National Police had conducted different raids in the region,
to dismantle self-defense and guerilla groups in the region.The National Human Rights Unit is responsible for the criminal
investigations into the illegal placement of constraints on members of
the CPDH and CUT of Risaralda.
42.
On October 2, 2002 the Commission granted precautionary
measures on behalf of one
person infected with HIV/AIDS.According to the request, on August 15, 2002 the beneficiary,
who lived alone and did not have any income, became unemployed and
hence was cut off of social insurance.Because the Colombian state offered access to treatment for
this disease through that vehicle, the beneficiary was automatically
removed from the HIV/AIDS program that he had been involved with since
November 1994, which provided him with anti-retroviral treatment (AZT
3TCIDV). According to Pan
American Health Organization standards, suspension of this treatment
for a person infected with HIV/AIDS is fatal.The Commission asked the State to resume the beneficiary’s
treatment. In response, the State took steps to include the
beneficiary in an ad hoc program providing access to anti-retroviral
treatment.
43.
On October 4, 2002 the Commission granted precautionary
measures in favor of Antonio
García Barrios, Israel Barreiro D., Henry Gordon A., Magangue, Jesús
Tovar C., Lidys Jaraba B., Carmen Torres de Orozco, Nicolás Castro
O., Edgar Pua Samper, Tomas Ramos Quiroz, José Meriño Camelo,
Euripides Yance Rodríguez, Campo Elias Quintero Ortiz, Limberto
Carranza Vanegas, Magangue, Jaime Camargo, Ismael Martínez Salcedo,
Evelio Mancera Sánchez, Agedo Llorente Arteagas, Jaime Castillo
Rogero, Plinio Avila Cassianis, Hernán Arturo Durango Patrillau, Luis
Fernando Arevalo Restrepo, members of the subdirective of the
Department of Atlántico of the Central Trade Union.The request presented to the Commission indicates that the
beneficiaries were declared a military objective by the AUC.Illegal armed groups under the denomination of “Los Chamos”,
"Los Mezas”, “Muerte a activistas revolucionarios”
and “Braca el que no falla” distributed written threats in
the metropolitan area which read “you will suffer the same fate as
Ricardo Orozco, because you are guerrillas.”Mr. Orozco was an ANTHOC union leader, assassinated on
September 27, 2001. The
State reported on the provision of security measures and the
initiation of a formal investigation regarding these threats.
44.
On October 29, 2002 the Commission granted precautionary
measures on behalf of Dr. Teresa
Cedeño Galíndez, president of the Permanent Committee for the
Defense of Human Rights (CPDH) of Arauca.The petitioners claimed that on October 2, 2002 a man who
identified himself as Commander Mario of the AUC made repeated calls
to the cell phone of attorney Teresa de Jesús Cedeño Galíndez,
threatening her with death and ordering her to leave the city and to
“stop defending the guerillas.”He also said that he would post a guard at her house and
expected not to see her there. The
AUC commander repeated the calls and a prosecutor from the support
structure had the opportunity to verify the veracity of the calls and
threats. On October 22,
2002, Dr. Cedeño Galíndez detected persons following her, as well as
movement of suspicious persons in front of her home.In its reply, the State reported that the prosecution office
assigned to work with the Criminal Law Judges of the Special Circuit
in Arauca was in the preliminary phases of an investigation and the
Ministry of the Interior had evaluated the situation of Teresa Cedeño
Galíndez and provided the beneficiary with a transportation and
cellular telephone allowance.
45.
On November 7, 2002 the IACHR granted precautionary
measures to protect the lives and persons of 515 families of Afro-Colombian descent (2,125 persons), members of the
Jiguamiandó Basin Community Council, who reside on 54,973
hectares of land, and families in the Curbaradó Basin, who live on
25,000 hectares of land, in the municipality of Carmen del Darién,
department of El Chocó, land collectively titled to them by the
national government on May 21, 2001. According to the information
received, starting in January 2001 and particularly after the
collective titles were given for the territory of communities of
Afro-Colombian descent, in accordance with Law 70 and the Constitution
of 1991, there has been a series of acts of violence, murders, and
forced displacements that had led nine communities in the Community
Council of Curbaradó to seek refuge in the Collective Territory of
Jiguamiandó and caused over 20 Afro-Colombian communities to flee
deep into the jungle. In
October 2002, armed paramilitary actions began to intensify and to
occupy the collectively owned land, penetrate the communities’
jungle refuges, and surround their departure routes.On October 16, 2002 approximately 160 men in military dress,
wearing AUC armbands, entered the Uradá indian reservation and
threatened the indigenous communities, saying: “either you join us or you leave. The next incursion will be into the
communities of Puerto Lleras and Pueblo Nuevo; from there we are going
to sweep these communities; either you join us or you leave; you have
to plant palm and coca; you are either with us or you leave.” In
the last week of October and the first week of November, 2002, there
was movement by “armed civilians” in the area around where the
families from Jiguamiandó and Curbaradó had sought refuge, in some
cases from paramilitary groups in Brisas, Cetino, Belén de Bajirá
near the presence of the Seventeenth Army Brigade and the point where
control actions are conducted on the Atrato River.The IACHR asked the State, inter
alia, to take preventive measures for perimeter control and to
fight paramilitary action in the Atrato River and other areas of
influence, in order to protect the beneficiary communities; facilitate
the operation of an early warning system, including an adequate,
reliable communications system with humanitarian areas; ensure the
institutional presence of entities such as the Office of the
Ombudsman, and the Office of the Attorney General of the Nation in the
humanitarian areas defined by the community (Remacho, Pueblo Nuevo,
Nueva Esperanza); take humanitarian measures to return the displaced
families to the humanitarian areas established by the communities;
effectively investigate the acts of violence and threats justifying
the adoption of precautionary measures; and prosecute and punish the
perpetrators. Nonetheless,
the Commission has continued to receive information in connection with
ongoing armed incursions into the territory of the protected
communities and on the human crisis that has befallen the
beneficiaries.
46.
On November 7, 2002 the IACHR granted precautionary
measures on behalf of Virgilio
Hernández Castellanos, who in the past twelve years has
held the positions of judge, regional prosecutor, director of the
attorney general’s office, chief of the National Human Rights Unit,
and chief of the National Anti-Corruption Unit of the Office of the
Attorney General of the Nation. According to the background
information, during his tenure as chief of the National Human Rights
Unit from 1997 to 1999, the beneficiary received direct and/or veiled
threats from Víctor Carranza Niño, Carlos Castaño, “Commander
Yara”, El Zarco, Co. Hernando Navas Rubio, Nelson Lesmes, and others
accused of committing serious human rights violations.On September 27, 2002 in an interview circulated in the media,
Carlos Castaño, commander of the AUC, said: “ ...I
believe that the current attorney general deserves all due respect,
our full confidence, however before... you only have to look at the
human rights unit, at Virgilio Hernández, ... people who support the
guerrillas. Since I was going to surrender, I am surrendering to
justice, not to the enemy.” This statement by the AUC commander
rendered the beneficiary a target for that armed organization. The
IACHR has learned that the beneficiary temporarily left the
territorial jurisdiction in order to protect himself.
47.
On November 14, 2002 the Commission requested precautionary
measures on behalf of 22 health
workers in the hospitals of Puerto Rico, Paujil, and Curillo in
Caqueta and San Vicente del Caguán. The petitioners mentioned a
series of acts of violence, threats, and displacements that occurred
from April to October 2002. They indicated that on April 18, 2002 Jhon
Fredy Marin, branch president of the National Association of Hospital
and Clinic Workers (ANTHOC), vaccinator, and health worker in the
municipio of Curillo in Caquetá, was killed by members of the AUC.
They also indicate, inter alia,
that on August 6, 2002, the FARC-EP established a checkpoint at the
health post along the highway connecting the municipality of Puerto
Rico with San Vicente del Cagúan, where health aid María Lilia
Ramírez works and lives with her family. She later received a death
threat from the AUC, giving her 12 hours to leave the region. On
September 27, 2002 nursing assistants Norbery Caicedo Matiz and Luz
Marina León, who work at the Local Hospital of Puerto Rico, received
death threats from the AUC against themselves and their families,
because of their health-related activities, which that group feels
help the insurgency.
48.
On November 19, 2002 the Commission granted precautionary
measures on behalf of Mrs. Marta
Lucía Rentería Barreiro, civic representative of Jamundí and
human rights defender.The beneficiary had denounced cases of corruption in
different municipalities in Valle del Cauca, which led the Office of
the Attorney General of the Nation to launch investigations and
resulted in disciplinary investigations against civil servants.She also denounced serious acts of violence in the department
of Valle del Cauca, particularly in the municipality of Jamundí, that
had led to the death, disappearance, and displacement of hundreds of
persons. The petitioners
alleged that, as a result, her life was in danger and that she was the
victim of harassment and threats and was followed in June, July,
August, and September 2002. They
indicated that both civil servants and paramilitary groups operating
in Valle del Cauca were behind these incidents and that other
popularly-elected civic representatives in the municipality had been
murdered and that those crimes had gone unpunished.They also claimed that she had been the victim of systematic
harassment. In its reply,
the State indicated that the Unit on Crimes against Individual Liberty
and Other Guarantees, Unit 28, in Santiago de Cali is in the
preliminary phase of investigations into the alleged offense of making
threats. The Technical
Investigative Body (CTI) is responsible for providing protection to
the beneficiary and her family, a measure taken along with security
rounds by the National Police, while waiting for the risk assessment
to be conducted by the DAS.
49.
On November 21, 2002 the IACHR granted precautionary
measures on behalf of Jairo
Pinzón López, Pedro Elías Quinteros Montejo, Omar Ramírez Rincón,
Holger Antonio Pérez Quintero, Carlos Daniel Botello Correa, Ramón
Angarita Peñaranda, Héctor Mauricio, Zambrano Pinto, Hernán Andrés
Molina, Javier Serrano Ramírez, and Evelio Guerrero, officials
and inhabitants of the municipality of San Calixto, Norte de
Santander. According to the information received by the IACHR since
October 5, 2002 a paramilitary group led by a former member of
Infantry Batallion Nº 15 of the Fifth Brigade, known as Reinel Lobo,
began to operate, with the consent of the Army, in the municipality of
Teorema and from there is planning to deploy to the municipality of
San Calixto in Norte de Santander. Mr. Lobo was one of the false
witnesses presented by the Fifth Brigade in a trial on open rebellion
against several public officials and residents of San Calixto that
eventually was shelved definitively.The petitioners alleged that on November 4, 2002 Reinel Lobo
and Army Captain Frailes Amarís Rico went up and down the streets of
San Calixto commenting that they had a list of persons to kill at the
request of paramilitary members.On November 15, 2002 a contingent of 200 paramilitary members
was positioned in the La Quina district, three kilometers from the
municipal capital of San Calixto (and two kilometers from the military
base). The petitioners
alleged that this caused social panic and led to the displacement of
many of San Calixto’s inhabitants, including town and political
leaders. The petitioners
indicated that this situation was reported to authorities with the
Fifth Brigade, the Office of the Ombudsman, the Office of the Attorney
General, and the central government, however no measures had been
taken.
f. Cuba
50.
On December 6, 2002 the Commission granted precautionary
measures on behalf of Francisco
Chaviano González, who has been denied freedom since 1994, when
he was detained while serving as president of the National Civil
Rights Council in Cuba. Mr. Chaviano suffers from many ailments,
including a back tumor, respiratory difficulties, a chronic infection
in one ear, and a peptic ulcer. The
petitioners alleged that prison authorities had denied the prisoner
specialized medical care and refused to authorize an analysis to
determine the nature of his tumor.The Commission asked the Cuban government to provide Mr.
Chaviano with specialized medical care.The State did not report to the IACHR on the measures
adopted.
g.
Dominican Republic
51.
On August 14, 2002 the Commission granted precautionary measures on
behalf of ten carriers of
HIV/AIDS. The beneficiaries are identified in the file, however,
at their request, their identity is being kept confidential in this
report. The petitioners allege that the beneficiaries went to health
centers or hospitals, but were not given the drug treatment needed to
fight the disease. As a result, the immune systems of these ten
persons are in a critical state, with low CD4 counts, and they do not
have access to clinical tests to monitor how the disease is
progressing. On September 3, 2002, the State indicated that it would
provide comprehensive care to the beneficiaries within four months and
would supply drugs to selected patients who meet the criteria set by
the National Commission on Anti-Retroviral Drugs (composed, inter
alia, of DIGECITSS, COPRESIDA, PAHO/WHO, REDOVIH, the Dominican
Society of Infectology, Subsecretariat of Drugs
and Pharmacies, and UNAIDS) in accordance with the availability of
the resources allocated for 2002. On September 16 and 26, 2002, the
IACHR broadened the precautionary measures on behalf of others, at the
petitioners’ request, covering 119 persons with HIV/AIDS. Despite
the State’s comments, the petitioners informed the Commission that
they have not yet received anti-retroviral drugs.
h.
Ecuador
52.
On February 11,
2002 the Commission granted precautionary measures in favor of
Ecuadorian Navy Captain Rogelio
Viteri and his family. Captain Viteri had been the target of death
threats as a result of his allegations of corruption against members
of the Ecuadorian Army. The Commission requested the Government to
protect the life and physical integrity of Captain Viteri, his wife
and their two children and to investigate the situation.On March 6, 2002 the State indicated that on February 15, 2002
an officer and four policemen were assigned to provide protection and
security to Captain Viteri and his family.In March, Captain Viteri informed the Commission that he had
been imprisoned for 23 days, that his functions as naval attaché had
been terminated and that he would no longer be eligible for
promotions. The
beneficiary also informed the Commission that on August 28, 2002 the Primera Sala del Tribunal Constitucional, granted his constitutional
amparo, and made it possible
for him to seek damages for the arrests and detentions that he
suffered.
53.
On July 9, 2002 the
Commission granted precautionary measures on behalf of six
Ecuadorian citizens who claimed to be HIV/AIDS carriers.For reasons of confidentiality their names are in the
Commission's files but not listed in this Annual Report.The petitioners argued, inter
alia, that State health agencies had failed to provide the
beneficiaries with basic testing to determine the course of the
disease as well as adequate treatment.The Commission requested that the State provide the
beneficiaries with the medical examination and treatment indispensable
for their survival. The
petitioners filed a second, third and fourth requests bringing the
total number of affected persons, by August 12, 2002, to 54.With each request, the Commission extended the precautionary
measures of July 9, 2002. On
August 26, 2002 the State indicated that the original six HIV/AIDS
carriers were receiving medical attention and that the Ministry of
Health had acquired medication to prevent mother-child transmission
for 100 women and to assist approximately 120 persons with HIV.Subsequently, the petitioners filed additional fifth
and sixth requests, bringing the total number of affected persons
by September 23, 2002 to 153 persons. Precautionary measures were
requested in these cases as well.On October 15, 2002 the Commission held a hearing on this
matter, at the request of the State.The petitioners have informed the Commission that approximately
18 HIV/AIDS carriers in this group have died.
[ Table of Contents |
Previous | Next ]
[1]
For an explanation on the situation in Ciudad Juárez, please see
the report of the Special Rapporteur for Women’s Rights in Chapter
VI of this Annual Report.
[2]
For an explanation on the situation in Ciudad Juárez, please see
the report of the Special Rapporteur for Women’s Rights in Chapter
VI of this Annual Report. |