Artículo XXIII

Nada en este instrumento puede ser interpretado en el sentido de excluir o limitar derechos presentes o futuros que los pueblos indígenas pueden tener o adquirir.


I.            ANTECEDENTES EN EL DERECHO INTERNACIONAL 

1.        Proyecto de Declaración de las Naciones Unidas sobre los Derechos de las Poblaciones Indígenas (ONU 1994) 

Artículo 44: "Nada de lo señalado en la presente Declaración se interpretará en el sentido de que limite o anule los derechos que los pueblos indígenas tienen en la actualidad o puedan adquirir en el futuro”. 

2.        Convenio 169, sobre Pueblos Indígenas y Tribales. Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT). 1989 

Artículo 35: "La aplicación de las disposiciones del presente Convenio no deberá menoscabar los derechos y las ventajas garantizados a los pueblos interesados en virtud de otros convenios y recomendaciones, instrumentos internacionales, tratados, o leyes, laudos, costumbres o acuerdos nacionales”. 

II.        ANTECEDENTES EN EL DERECHO NACIONAL 

3.         Canadá 

- Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, 2.2.6 

“The Commission recommends that the federal government establish a process for making new treaties to replace the existing comprehensive claims policy, based on the following principles: 

(a) The blanket extinguishment of Aboriginal land rights is not an option.” 

Vol. 2 Ch. 4 s. 5 

“The Commission cannot support the extinguishment of Aboriginal rights, either blanket or partial. It seems to us completely incompatible with the relationship between Aboriginal peoples and the land. This relationship is fundamental to the Aboriginal world view and sense of identity; to abdicate the responsibilities associated with it would have deep spiritual and cultural implications.” 

- Anishnaabe Government Agreement in Principle, 5.5.9.1 

“It is of fundamental importance to maintain the amount and integrity of First Nation land, and Canada agrees that, as a general principle, First Nation land shall not be expropriated.” 

5.5.10.1 

“In the event of the expropriation of First Nation land, Canada shall provide compensation to the First Nation.” 

5.5.10.2  

“The compensation shall include alternate land of equal or greater size or of comparable value. If the alternate land is of less than comparable value, then additional compensation shall be provided. The alternate land may be smaller than the land being expropriated only if that does not result in the First Nation having less land area than when it adopted gchi-naaknigewin.” 

9.3  

“Nothing in the final Agreement shall affect the ability of the First Nation or e-dbendaagzijig to enjoy or exercise any existing or future constitutional rights of aboriginal peoples of Canada, or to benefit from any other arrangements or agreements that may be applicable.” 

- Nisga’a Agreement 

“Canada acknowledges that it is of fundamental importance to maintain the size and integrity of Nisga'a Lands and Nisga'a Fee Simple Lands, and therefore, as a general principle, estates or interests in Nisga'a Lands, or Nisga'a Fee Simple Lands, will not be expropriated under federal legislation.”

  

 [ Indice | Anterior | Próximo ]